1. Conditions:
The services available in 'George' are only available for use if there is an ongoing business relationship with the credit institution.
2. User:
Persons who are in a business relationship with the credit institution ([(joint] account holder, authorised signatories) are called "authorised users" or "customers" in the following.
2.1. User authorisation:
Authorisation to use the services under this agreement may only be granted to the account holder or to persons that are authorised by the account holder or to representatives determined by law. Persons who do not hold an account with the credit institution have only limited use of "George"; in particular, they are unable to execute payment transactions via "George".
2.2. Log-in / Authorisation:
Transactions subject to identity verification and authorisation are authorised using the authorisation method agreed with the customer.
3. Diligence:
The customer must take all precautions that he/she can reasonably be expected to take to protect the personalised security features (especially PIN, code) against unauthorised access. Payment initiation service providers and payment providers that issue card-based payment instruments and carry out checks to establish whether the account balance is sufficient do not qualify as 'unauthorised' within the meaning of this present provision. Customers must report to the credit institution any loss, theft, misuse or any unauthorised use of the personalised security codes without undue delay as soon as they become aware thereof via the account-managing party or the card hotline by dialling + 43 (0) 50100 plus the sort code of the credit institution.
When such a report is submitted, the credit institution shall have the personalised security codes blocked without undue delay. The requested block will become effective immediately upon receipt of the blocking request.
The credit institution shall be authorised to block a customer’s "George" access without prior consultation in the following cases:
- if objective reasons relating to "George" security justify such a block
- when unauthorised or fraudulent use of "George" and/or the personalised security codes is suspected
- if there is a considerably increased risk that the customer cannot fulfil his payment obligations for a credit line linked with "George". In particular, such a significantly increased risk arises if the customer has failed to honour his payment obligations for a credit line linked with "George" (overrun or overdraft) and
o either the fulfilment of these payment obligations is jeopardised due to the deterioration of or a threat to the customer's
o a threat to the customer's or a co-debtor's financial situation or the customer has become insolvent or insolvency is imminent.
The credit institution shall inform the customer of any such deactivation and of the reasons for such a deactivation, and of any deactivation of the account information service provider's and/or the payment initiation service provider's access to a payment account held by the customer and about the reasons for such access deactivation using a means of communication agreed with the customer, where possible before and at the latest after implementation of such deactivation.
The duty to notify shall not be applicable if notification of the deactivation, or of the reasons for such deactivation, would violate a judicial or administrative order or run counter to any Austrian or Community legislation or any objective security considerations.
After four attempts to access the account using the wrong personalised identification codes, the authorised user is automatically blocked from accessing the system.
The customer can have his or her George access blocked at any time by calling the dedicated George helpline on +43 (0) 50100 + credit institution's sort code or by asking for access to be blocked in person at any of the credit institution's branches. This will cause all services to be blocked. Access reactivation must be requested by the customer either in writing (original signature) or in person at any of the credit institution's branches.
If a customer is not connected with the credit institution or in the event of disruptions, the customer is obliged – in order to minimize losses – to immediately make use of any other means of communication available (e.g., telephone call to the 24h-Service instead of the internet).
4. Liability of customers and credit institution:
4.1. Customer's liability for payment transactions in "George"
4.1.1. If payment transactions that have not been authorised by the customer result from the use of a lost or stolen payment instrument or the fraudulent use of a payment instrument, the customer shall be obliged to compensate the credit institution for the entire loss it incurs, if the customer
· facilitated the loss with fraudulent intent or
· brought about the loss through intentional or grossly negligent breach of the due diligence requirements related to the careful safekeeping and use of payment instruments set forth in section 3.
4.1.2. If a customer has breached the due diligence requirements set forth in section 3 only through slight negligence, the customer's liability for any losses incurred shall be limited to EUR 50.
4.1.3. The customer shall not be liable
- if the loss, theft or fraudulent use of the payment instrument could not have been noticed by customer or the loss of the payment instrument was caused by actions or omissions attributable to the credit institution.
- for payment transactions implemented with a payment instrument after the credit institution had been requested to block that specific payment instrument, unless the customer acted with fraudulent intent.
- for payment transactions in relation to which the customer was unable to make notification of loss, theft or fraudulent use of the payment instrument due to reasons for which the credit institution is responsible, unless the customer acted with fraudulent intent.
- for unauthorised payment transactions with which the credit institution does not require substantial customer identity verification, unless the customer acted with fraudulent intent.
4.1.4. When a customer causes loss neither through fraudulent intent nor through deliberate breach of a due diligence requirement as set forth under section 3., the type of personalised security codes and the specific circumstances under which the loss, theft or fraudulent use of the payment instrument occurred must be taken into account if liability for loss is to be shared between the customer and the credit institution.
4.1.5. Points 4.1.1 through 4.1.4 are not applicable for entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs shall be liable for any losses arising out of payment transactions using George that are sustained by the credit institution due to the entrepreneur's breach of the due diligence requirements defined in section 3., without limitation in case of any type of negligence.
4.2. Further liability on the part of the customer when using "George" (insofar as liability for payment transactions are not concerned [subsection 4.1] If customers transfer their personalised security codes to a third party or if an unauthorised third party obtains knowledge of the personalised security codes due to a breach of the customer's due diligence requirements set forth in section. 3., the customer shall bear the consequences and any disadvantages resulting from a loss, theft or fraudulent use of the payment instrument until such time as the block becomes effective (see section 3). Any contributory negligence on the part of the credit institution shall be taken into account and reduce liability. The customer’s liability ceases once the block takes effect. Subsection 4.2. is equally applicable for consumers and entrepreneurs.
4.3. The credit institution will be held liable only for damage caused in connection with the customer’s hardware or software or by failure to achieve a connection with the credit institution’s data centre, if this damage was caused culpably.
4.4. The credit institution shall not be responsible for the operability and content of third-party websites (e.g. Google Maps) to which the customer is redirected in the context of “George”. The credit institution further notes that contents and opinions contained on third-party websites do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the credit institution and its employees.
5. Revocation/termination:
5.1. Customers shall have the right to terminate, in writing and at any time, any further use of the services under this agreement with the credit institution with immediate effect.
5.2. Subject to a 2-month notice period, the credit institution has the right to terminate the user subscription to 'George' and/or user access to any (selected) plug-ins at any time without having to specify the reasons for such termination.
In its letter of termination, the credit institution is obliged to indicate (i) the point in time at which the user subscription to 'George' and/or user access to any plug-ins ends and to specify (ii) the fee that is payable for any plug-ins until such termination becomes effective.
If 'George' is terminated by the credit institution, the notice of termination will either be sent to the email address last provided to the credit institution and/or it will be deposited electronically; in the latter case, a separate email will inform the customer of receipt in the 'George' inbox.
Where applicable, the customer will be obliged to pay any fee payable for 'George' and/or the plug-ins for the time in which the subscription to 'George' and/or the plug-ins was active.
5.3. Use of the plug-in depends on whether there is an active 'George' user subscription. Once the user subscription to 'George' ends, the subscription to plug-ins automatically ends on the day the user subscription to 'George' ends without requiring any separate notice of termination.
Plug-ins may be terminated separately by either the customer or the credit institution; in this regard, the provision of section 5.2. relating to termination and the fee applies analogously.
6) Amendment of the Terms of business for the usage of Internetbanking “George”:
The credit institution will propose any amendments to the 'Terms of business for the usage of Internetbanking "George"' to the customer by no later than two months prior to the proposed time of their entry into force and point out the provisions affected by any such amendments. The customer's consent will be deemed given unless the credit institution receives an objection from the customer prior to the proposed time of entry into force. The credit institution will point this out to the customer along with the proposed amendment.
Notification can be made by letter, postal delivery of an account statement or – provided the customer agrees - electronically. In addition, the credit institution will publish a side-by-side comparison of the provisions of the 'Terms of business for the usage of Internetbanking "George"' affected by an amendment as well as the complete version of the new 'Terms of business for the usage of Internetbanking "George" on its website and provide this side-by-side comparison to the customer at the latter's request. The credit institution will point this out along with the proposed amendment.
In case of such an intended amendment of the 'Terms of business for the usage of Internetbanking "George"', customers who qualify as consumers will be entitled to terminate their respective master agreement for payment services (especially the current account agreement) without notice and free of charge. The credit institution will point this out along with the proposed amendment. The above subsections do not apply in the event of a change in the credit institution's payments (including credit interest) and the remuneration payable by the customer (including debit interest).